Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 19 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STT | $47.4B | 18.5× | — | 3.4× | 7.3% | — | 21.1% | 10.6% | 10.6% | — | 388 |
| NTRS | $31.6B | 19.8× | — | 3.9× | -2.5% | — | 21.5% | 13.4% | 13.4% | — | 272 |
| CFG | $27.7B | 17.0× | — | 3.4× | 5.6% | — | 22.2% | 7.0% | 4.9% | — | 319 |
| FCNCA | $26.5B | 14.4× | — | 2.8× | -2.2% | — | 23.1% | 9.9% | 3.8% | — | 162 |
| ALLY | $12.1B | 16.7× | — | 1.5× | -3.3% | — | 10.8% | 5.5% | 2.5% | — | 140 |
| UCB | $4.5B | 14.2× | — | 4.2× | 11.7% | — | 30.9% | 9.0% | 8.5% | — | 84 |
| FBP | $4.0B | 12.4× | — | 3.2× | 2.4% | — | 27.5% | 17.5% | 15.3% | — | 67 |
| FHB | $3.1B | 11.7× | — | 3.5× | 8.9% | — | 31.4% | 10.0% | 10.0% | — | 74 |
| BUSE | $2.4B | 20.1× | — | 3.4× | 55.7% | — | 18.8% | 5.5% | 5.5% | — | 61 |
| GABC | $1.9B | 16.1× | — | 3.8× | 37.8% | — | 23.1% | 9.7% | 8.9% | — | 39 |
| PEBO | $1.4B | 13.0× | 13.5× | 16.1× | 2.3% | — | — | 8.8% | 5.5% | 3.8× | 41 |
| UVSP | $1.1B | 12.6× | — | 3.3× | 9.6% | — | 27.7% | 9.6% | 9.4% | — | 49 |
| FMNB | $934M | 10.9× | — | 3.3× | 3.9% | — | 19.5% | 11.2% | 6.4% | — | 33 |
| WASH | $750M | 14.5× | — | 3.3× | 128% | — | 22.8% | 9.6% | 9.6% | — | 39 |
| ACNB | $667M | 18.2× | — | 3.5× | 45.1% | — | 19.3% | 8.8% | 5.0% | — | 22 |
| BSVN | $565M | 13.2× | — | — | — | — | — | 17.2% | 17.2% | — | 14 |
| COFS | $523M | 17.4× | — | 2.3× | 63.6% | — | 12.4% | 6.1% | 6.1% | — | 23 |
| CFFI | $362M | 13.4× | — | 2.6× | 10.6% | — | 19.1% | 10.3% | 9.5% | — | 11 |
| MYFW | $307M | 23.5× | — | 3.2× | 7.6% | — | 13.6% | 5.0% | 5.0% | — | 17 |
| MNSB | $153M | 12.2× | — | 1.1× | -1.6% | 54.3% | 11.5% | 7.1% | 7.1% | — | 16 |
Peers = companies sharing BSVN's sector (State Commercial Banks) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 23% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $9.3M dividends + $0 buybacks = $9.3M returned on $41.4M FCF.
4 consecutive years of dividend increases · 0%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 17%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 14 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Expense | — | — | $39.0M | $9.3M | $3.1M | $6.2M | $9.5M | $7.2M | $4.7M | $3.3M |
| Pretax Income | $56.8M | $60.4M | $37.2M | $39.3M | $30.9M | $25.9M | $15.1M | $25.8M | $23.8M | $16.8M |
| Income Tax Expense | $13.7M | $14.7M | $8.9M | $9.6M | $7.8M | $6.6M | $6.8M | $797K | $0 | $0 |
| Net Income | $43.1M | $45.7M | $28.3M | $29.6M | $23.2M | $19.3M | $8.2M | $25.0M | $23.8M | $16.8M |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.56 | $4.92 | $3.09 | $3.26 | $2.56 | $2.05 | $0.81 | $3.08 | $3.26 | $2.31 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.50 | $4.84 | $3.05 | $3.22 | $2.55 | $2.05 | $0.81 | $3.03 | $3.26 | $2.31 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 9.4M | 9.3M | 9.2M | 9.1M | 9.1M | 9.4M | 10.1M | 8.1M | 7.3M | 7.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 9.6M | 9.4M | 9.3M | 9.2M | 9.1M | 9.4M | 10.1M | 8.2M | 7.3M | 7.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | 4 co-filers Executive Vice President | Option exercise | 1,750 | $18.49 | $32k |
| 2026-10-20 | 4 co-filers Executive Vice President | Exercise & sell | 1,614 | $57.60 | $93k |
| 2026-10-20 | 4 co-filers Executive Vice President | Exercise & sell | 136 | $57.79 | $8k |
| 2026-10-20 | 4 co-filers Executive Vice President | Option exercise |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
| 1,750 |
| $0.00 |
| — |
| 2026-08-04 | 2 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Open-market sale | 2,077 | $50.17 | $104k |
| 2026-08-03 | 2 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Open-market sale | 400 | $51.25 | $21k |
| 2026-07-29 | Mathews Darrell Lee Jr. Executive Vice President | Grant | 3,500 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Litchfield Henry VP; General Counsel | Grant | 2,500 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | 3 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Grant | 8,198 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Buergler William M Director | Grant | 866 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | 2 co-filers EVP; CFO | Grant | 4,471 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | 2 co-filers President & CEO | Grant | 18,581 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Haines Douglas A Reg. Pres. of West. OK & KS | Grant | 2,500 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Gray Edward Patrick Director | Grant | 866 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Whitcomb Gary D Director | Grant | 823 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Dick Teresa L. Director | Grant | 769 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | 2 co-filers Sr. EVP; COO; and Secretary | Grant | 5,843 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | Levinson Andrew J Regional President - Tulsa | Grant | 3,500 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-29 | 3 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Tax withholding | 301 | $50.32 | $15k |
| 2026-07-29 | 2 co-filers Sr. EVP; COO; and Secretary | Tax withholding | 156 | $50.32 | $8k |
| 2026-07-29 | 2 co-filers EVP; CFO | Tax withholding | 116 | $50.32 | $6k |
| 2026-07-29 | 2 co-filers President & CEO | Tax withholding | 572 | $50.32 | $29k |
| 2026-07-29 | 3 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Tax withholding | 1,654 | $50.32 | $83k |
| 2026-07-22 | Travis Thomas L President & CEO | Open-market sale | 6,500 | $48.01 | $312k |
| 2026-07-22 | 5 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Open-market sale | 1,824 | $48.25 | $88k |
| 2026-07-21 | 5 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Option exercise | 1,250 | $14.31 | $18k |
| 2026-07-21 | 5 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Exercise & sell | 1,250 | $49.20 | $62k |
| 2026-07-21 | 5 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Exercise & sell | 1,975 | $49.70 | $98k |
| 2026-07-21 | 5 co-filers Exec. Vice President; CCO | Option exercise | 1,250 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-28 | Haines Douglas A Reg. Pres. of West. OK & KS | Open-market sale | 1,000 | $44.07 | $44k |
| 2026-05-05 | Mathews Darrell Lee Jr. Executive Vice President | Open-market sale | 1,000 | $43.00 | $43k |
| 2026-03-09 | Travis Thomas L President & CEO | Open-market sale | 6,000 | $40.00 | $240k |
| 2026-02-19 | Phillips John T Sr. EVP; COO; and Secretary | Giftindirect156d late | 500 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-02-15 | Travis Thomas L President & CEO | Tax withholding | 6,716 | $43.92 | $295k |
| 2026-02-15 | Harris Kelly J EVP; CFO | Tax withholding | 1,145 | $43.92 | $50k |
| 2026-02-15 | Phillips John T Sr. EVP; COO; and Secretary | Tax withholding | 1,636 | $43.92 | $72k |
| 2026-02-15 | Estes Jason E Exec. Vice President; CCO | Tax withholding | 3,308 | $43.92 | $145k |
| 2026-02-15 | Litchfield Henry VP; General Counsel | Tax withholding | 821 | $43.92 | $36k |
| 2026-02-15 | Haines Douglas A Reg. Pres. of West. OK & KS | Tax withholding | 804 | $43.92 | $35k |
| 2026-02-15 | Levinson Andrew J Regional President - Tulsa | Tax withholding | 1,503 | $43.92 | $66k |
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 94th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 17% against ROIC 17% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is 18.6% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BSVN: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Return on equity (17%) and return on invested capital (17%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
Converts 1.26x of reported profit into free cash flow over 5 years, with accruals negative.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $43M | $43M |
| Share-based comp | $3M | $46M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $5,000 | $46M |
| Operating cash flow | $46M | $46M |
| Capex | −$5M | $41M |
| Free cash flow | $41M | $41M |
| FCF after SBC | $38M | $38M |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | -1.3 percent |
| FY2020 | -0.6 percent |
| FY2021 | -0.5 percent |
| FY2022 | -0.6 percent |
| FY2023 | -1.2 percent |
| FY2024 | -0.5 percent |
| FY2025 | -0.2 percent |
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.
The cash conversion cycle could not be computed — receivables, inventory or cost of revenue is not reported — so the earliest accrual warning is not part of this verdict.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
At $59.30, free cash flow must compound 0.97%/yr for 10 years. It has done 17.07%/yr over 6 years.
| Fiscal year | FCF growth | Price requires |
|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 54.2% | 1.0% |
| FY2021 | 19.1% | 1.0% |
| FY2022 | 33.5% | 1.0% |
| FY2023 | 17.4% | 1.0% |
| FY2024 | 9.8% | 1.0% |
| FY2025 | −18.6% | 1.0% |
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
The cost of capital could not be computed for this company, so the requirement is solved at the published 10% default — a different rate would move it materially.