Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 35% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $10.1M dividends + $0 buybacks = $10.1M returned on $28.5M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 4 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 4 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 3 positive fiscal years (FY2023, FY2024, FY2025). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
A reverse DCF cannot be solved for BTMCQ: its net cash ($5.1M) exceeds its market value, so enterprise value is negative. Discounting a positive cash-flow stream always gives a positive number, so no growth rate reaches that target. This is common for banks, brokers and payment companies, where customer balances sit in the cash line and are not the company's to spend.
On the basis ($23.0M) the requirement is off the scale. Shares issued to employees are added back in operating cash flow, so this basis treats them as free.
Default is the published 10.0% — this company's own cost of capital could not be computed.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt -$5.1M
Today's price is outside this grid at every discount rate shown — the assumptions it requires lie beyond the plotted range, which is itself the finding.
mean 35.5% · volatility σ 106% · implied rate exceeded in 2/3 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (106%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $65.6M covers all $60.5M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (S-1/A).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04 · 88d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $614.9M 100.0% | $573.7M 100.0% | $689.0M 100.0% | $646.8M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $64.4M 10.5% | $57.2M 10.0% | $57.8M 8.4% | $37.0M 5.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $72.1M 11.7% | $67.2M 11.7% | $70.6M 10.2% | $55.8M 8.6% |
| Operating Income | $41.2M 6.7% | $24.2M 4.2% | $30.5M 4.4% | $16.5M 2.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$19.9M -3.2% | -$14.3M -2.5% | -$29.0M -4.2% | -$12.6M -1.9% |
| Pretax Income | $7.0M 1.1% | $10.0M 1.7% | $1.5M 0.2% | $3.9M 0.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.3M 0.4% | $2.1M 0.4% | $49K 0.0% | $395K 0.1% |
| Net Income | -$6.2M -1.0% | -$11.7M -2.0% | -$26.1M -3.8% | $0 0.0% |
| Per Share | ||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$0.86 | -$4.21 | -$1.57 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$0.86 | -$4.21 | -$1.57 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 7.1M | 2.8M | 16.7M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 7.1M | 2.8M | 16.7M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -54% against ROIC -9% — -46% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 9.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 5.7 | 8.4 | 10.0 | 10.5 |
| Operating Income | 2.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Income Tax | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Net Income | 0.0 | -3.8 | -2.0 | -1.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on BTMCQ: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Cash conversion and accruals. The full answer — share-based compensation, the cash conversion waterfall, working-capital trend — is still being built, so this block states what it measures rather than issuing a verdict.
One year is not a trend. The spec asks for a 3- and 5-year average of FCF/net income precisely because a single year turns on working-capital timing, and that arrives with the full Q2 block.