Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Ranked against 17 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | $37.1B | 33.4× | — | 0.9× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 275 |
| TRNO | $7.2B | 16.8× | — | 15.0× | 24.5% | — | 84.6% | 9.7% | 7.9% | — | 72 |
| FSV | $6.3B | 45.6× | 13.8× | 1.1× | 5.4% | — | 3.5% | 13.9% | 7.8% | 1.8× | 47 |
| CIGI | $4.9B | 47.6× | 10.1× | 0.9× | 15.3% | — | 4.0% | 14.6% | 7.1% | 2.3× | 21 |
| CURB | $3.5B | 77.7× | — | 19.1× | 51.3% | — | 21.8% | 2.1% | 1.7% | — | 48 |
| CWK | $3.1B | 34.5× | 9.1× | 0.3× | 8.9% | — | 0.9% | 4.5% | 1.9% | 3.5× | 3 |
| UE | $2.5B | 26.6× | — | 5.3× | 6.1% | — | 19.8% | 6.8% | 6.8% | — | 45 |
| GTY | $1.9B | 20.8× | — | 8.5× | 9.0% | — | 35.7% | 7.4% | 3.8% | — | 66 |
| IIPR | $1.6B | 13.6× | 9.7× | 5.9× | -13.8% | — | 44.5% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 1.8× | 68 |
| FOR | $1.3B | 7.6× | — | 0.8× | 10.1% | 21.9% | 10.1% | 9.5% | 6.5% | — | 29 |
| HPP | $602M | — | 1.4× | 0.7× | -1.3% | 48.5% | -71.3% | -19.9% | -19.9% | -0.4× | 32 |
| AHRT | $456M | — | 14.0× | 2.2× | 2.7% | — | 2.7% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 10.3× | 43 |
| TRC | $453M | — | — | 9.1× | 18.4% | 29.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 26 |
| SKYH | $394M | 110.7× | — | 14.3× | 86.6% | — | 68.3% | 10.9% | 5.2% | — | 17 |
| FRPH | $364M | 105.2× | 30.2× | 8.5× | 2.6% | — | 7.8% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 10.5× | 22 |
| NTPIF | $268M | — | — | 5.6× | 64.5% | 25.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| CHCI | $192M | — | 13.1× | 3.1× | 22.6% | 23.5% | 27.1% | 24.4% | 24.4% | -2.6× | 5 |
| CSUI | $544243 | — | — | — | -100% | — | — | -7.3% | -12.5% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing CSUI's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$40K FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -12%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $476 (at 2026-05-31) covers the $0 due within a year 476.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-08-31 (10-Q). The cash figure is from 2026-05-31, so the two are not the same balance-sheet date — the schedule has not been refiled since.
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~9.3% on $696K of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $23K 100.0% | $30K 100.0% | $10K 100.0% | $8K 100.0% | $51K 100.0% | $243K 100.0% | $8K 100.0% | — | $7K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $22K | $22K 98.1% | $30K 100.2% | $9K 91.7% | $2K 22.3% | $37K 72.7% | $183K 75.3% | $3K 33.7% | — | $2K 35.4% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2K 35.4% |
| Gross Profit | -$931 | $432 1.9% | -$67 -0.2% | $834 8.3% | $6K 77.7% | -$52K -101.9% | -$85K -34.9% | $5K 66.3% | — | $4K 64.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $211K | $229K 1016.2% | $175K 582.3% | $61K 607.0% | $136K 1745.3% | $257K 506.2% | $174K 71.8% | $4K 56.7% | — | $2K 25.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $267K | $288K 1282.0% | $257K 856.2% | $344K 3435.2% | $163K 2100.3% | $307K 603.1% | $267K 109.8% | $28K 368.1% | — | $21K 317.2% |
| Operating Income | -$268K | -$288K -1280.1% | -$257K -856.5% | -$343K -3426.8% | -$157K -2022.6% | -$358K -704.9% | -$351K -144.7% | -$23K -301.8% | — | -$16K -252.6% |
| Interest Expense | $65K | $63K 280.9% | $27K 89.3% | $9K 88.6% | $64K 818.3% | $60K 118.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $391K | -$168K -747.2% | -$930K -3098.9% | -$9K -88.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $123K | -$456K -2027.3% | -$1.2M -3955.4% | -$352K -3515.5% | -$188K -2418.1% | -$411K -808.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $123K | -$456K -2027.3% | -$1.2M -3955.4% | -$352K -3515.5% | -$188K -2418.1% | -$411K -808.1% | -$389K -160.3% | -$23K -301.8% | — | -$16K -252.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.00 | -$0.01 | -$0.03 | -$0.01 | -$0.01 | -$0.01 | — | $0.00 | — | $0.00 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.00 | -$0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 70.7M | 70.7M | 47.3M | 42.0M | 33.1M | 34.5M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 210.9M | 70.7M | — | — | — | — | 35.5M | 52.0M | — | 57.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -7% against ROIC -12% — 5% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 33.7 | 75.3 | 72.7 | 22.3 | 91.7 | 100.2 | 98.1 | — |
| Gross Profit | 66.3 | -34.9 | -101.9 | 77.7 | 8.3 | -0.2 | 1.9 | — |
| SG&A | 56.7 | 71.8 | 506.2 | 1745.3 | 607.0 | 582.3 | 1016.2 | — |
| Operating Income | -301.8 | -144.7 | -704.9 | -2022.6 | -3426.8 | -856.5 | -1280.1 | — |
| Income Tax | — | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
| Net Income | -301.8 | -160.3 | -808.1 | -2418.1 | -3515.5 | -3955.4 | -2027.3 | — |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on CSUI: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2018 | 64.6% | -252.6% | -252.6% |
| FY2019 | 66.3% | -301.8% | -301.8% |
| FY2020 | -34.9% | -144.7% | -160.3% |
| FY2021 | -101.9% | -704.9% | -808.1% |
| FY2022 | 77.7% | -2022.6% | -2418.1% |
| FY2023 | 8.3% | -3426.8% | -3515.5% |
| FY2024 | -0.2% | -856.5% | -3955.4% |
| FY2025 | 1.9% | -1280.1% | -2027.3% |
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Ladder as of 2026-08-31 (10-Q); cash from the 2026-05-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2026. Free cash flow is negative, so projected resources fall rather than accumulate.
Balance sheet at 2026-05-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.