Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 17 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 41% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $24.5M dividends + $0 buybacks = $24.5M returned on $59.6M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · -10%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 9% against ROIC 9% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MITT: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Expense | — | — | $212.5M | $118.9M | $27.3M | $36.9M | $90.1M | $70.5M | $43.7M | $33.8M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $13.2M | $21.7M | $46.0M | -$61.2M | $59.6M | -$424.1M | $39.1M | -$71.5M | $43.6M | -$4.7M |
| Pretax Income | $49.6M | $55.8M | $55.2M | -$42.8M | $72.3M | -$420.0M | $89.7M | -$12.1M | $105.9M | $62.2M |
| Income Tax Expense | $888K | $112K | $250K | $163K | $0 | — | — | — | — | $0 |
| Net Income | $48.7M | $55.7M | $53.8M | -$53.1M | $104.2M | -$420.9M | $92.9M | $1.6M | $118.6M | $63.7M |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.90 | $1.23 | $1.68 | -$3.12 | $5.29 | -$36.73 | $2.39 | -$0.42 | $3.77 | $1.80 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.90 | $1.23 | $1.68 | -$3.12 | $5.29 | -$36.73 | $2.39 | -$0.42 | $3.77 | $1.80 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 30.5M | 29.5M | 21.1M | 22.9M | 16.2M | 11.7M | 32.2M | 28.4M | 27.9M | 28.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 30.6M | 29.5M | 21.1M | 22.9M | 16.2M | 11.7M | 32.2M | 28.4M | 27.9M | 28.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
Return on equity (9%) and return on invested capital (9%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: beta, market_cap.
Converts 0.74x of reported profit into cash — adequate, without much margin.
The cash conversion cycle could not be computed — receivables, inventory or cost of revenue is not reported — so the earliest accrual warning is not part of this verdict.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
No current price or share count, so the market's assumption cannot be solved for.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. No TTM point: the four most recent quarters do not form a usable window.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: market_cap.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-31 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Other | 0 | $7.09 | — |
| 2026-04-30 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Other | 0 |
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $49M | $49M |
| Share-based comp | $712,000 | $49M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $10M | $60M |
| Operating cash flow | $60M | $60M |
| Capex | $0 | $60M |
| Free cash flow | $60M | $60M |
| FCF after SBC | $59M | $59M |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | 0.6 percent |
| FY2020 | -30.4 percent |
| FY2021 | 2.3 percent |
| FY2022 | -1.7 percent |
| FY2023 | 0.4 percent |
| FY2024 | 0.0 percent |
| FY2025 | -0.1 percent |
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.
| $7.69 |
| — |
| 2026-04-29 | Hurley Dianne Director | Grant | 12,979 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-29 | Hess Debra Ann Director | Grant | 16,931 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-29 | Jozoff Matthew Director | Grant | 12,979 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-29 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 12,979 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Jozoff Matthew Director | Grant | 2,777 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Grant | 2,777 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Hurley Dianne Director | Grant | 2,777 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Hess Debra Ann Director | Grant | 3,819 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-30 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Other | 0 | $8.97 | — |
| 2026-01-13 | Neslin Jenny B General Counsel & Secretary | Tax withholding | 7,640 | $8.86 | $68k |
| 2026-01-13 | Rossiello Anthony William CFO & Treasurer | Tax withholding | 6,933 | $8.86 | $61k |
| 2026-01-02 | Hess Debra Ann Director | Grant | 3,201 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-02 | Hurley Dianne Director | Grant | 2,328 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-02 | Jozoff Matthew Director | Grant | 2,328 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-02 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Grant | 2,328 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2025-10-31 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Other | 459 | $7.07 | — |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.