Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$1.3M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 22%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1M 100.0% | $4.1M 100.0% | $2.4M 100.0% | $1.5M 100.0% | $438K 100.0% | $55K 100.0% | $30K 100.0% | $50K 100.0% | $29K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.3M 44.9% | $1.3M 31.3% | $734K 30.5% | $653K 42.7% | $288K 65.7% | $44K 79.8% | $56K 184.4% | $68K 136.4% | $5K 16.4% |
| Gross Profit | $2.8M 55.1% | $2.8M 68.7% | $1.7M 69.5% | $877K 57.3% | $150K 34.3% | $11K 20.2% | -$25K -84.4% | -$18K -36.4% | $24K 83.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.1M 22.0% | $798K 19.4% | $753K 31.2% | $8.2M 535.9% | $149K 34.1% | $30K 54.2% | $31K 104.2% | $43K 85.9% | $92K 314.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $3.7M 72.1% | $2.7M 66.8% | $2.4M 99.2% | $2.1M 134.7% | $10.1M 2299.6% | $460K 834.3% | $1.6M 5201.1% | $237K 472.9% | $525K 1795.7% |
| Operating Income | -$867K -17.0% | $81K 2.0% | -$715K -29.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Expense | $7.4M 146.0% | $5.6M 137.3% | $6.5M 269.4% | — | $2.7M 622.2% | $4.2M 7632.8% | $571K 1896.8% | $528K 1054.3% | $384K 1312.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$6.9M -136.2% | -$5.6M -137.4% | -$9.1M -377.5% | -$4.4M -287.8% | -$2.7M -622.2% | — | — | — | $2K 7.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$1.6M -32.2% | -$1.2M -28.3% | -$2.1M -85.5% | -$1.2M -75.6% | -$2.7M -617.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | -$7.8M -153.2% | -$5.6M -135.4% | -$9.8M -407.2% | -$5.5M -359.9% | -$12.9M -2942.4% | -$5.9M -10703.5% | -$2.5M -8335.2% | -$2.1M -4105.6% | -$377K -1289.3% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$0.62 | -$0.44 | -$0.79 | -$0.45 | -$1.12 | -$0.63 | -$0.47 | -$0.50 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$0.62 | -$0.44 | -$0.79 | -$0.45 | -$1.12 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 12.6M | 12.5M | 12.4M | 12.2M | 11.5M | 9.3M | 5.3M | 4.1M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 12.6M | 12.5M | 12.4M | 12.2M | 11.5M | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-29
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 11th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 22% against ROIC 22% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 136.4 | 184.4 | 79.8 | 65.7 | 42.7 | 30.5 | 31.3 | 44.9 |
| Gross Profit | -36.4 | -84.4 | 20.2 | 34.3 | 57.3 | 69.5 | 68.7 | 55.1 |
| SG&A | 85.9 | 104.2 | 54.2 | 34.1 | 535.9 | 31.2 | 19.4 | 22.0 |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | — | — | -29.7 | 2.0 | -17.0 |
| Income Tax | — | — | — | -617.9 | -75.6 | -85.5 | -28.3 | -32.2 |
| Net Income | -4105.6 | -8335.2 | -10703.5 | -2942.4 | -359.9 | -407.2 | -135.4 | -153.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RMTG: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 1 positive fiscal year (FY2024). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
A reverse DCF cannot be solved for RMTG: its net cash ($957K) exceeds its market value, so enterprise value is negative. Discounting a positive cash-flow stream always gives a positive number, so no growth rate reaches that target. This is common for banks, brokers and payment companies, where customer balances sit in the cash line and are not the company's to spend.
Default is 10.0% — this company's computed cost of capital, the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt -$957K
Today's price is outside this grid at every discount rate shown — the assumptions it requires lie beyond the plotted range, which is itself the finding.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 38 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVS | $115.5B | 65.0× | 11.6× | 0.3× | 7.8% | 45.0% | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | -0.9× | 656 |
| JD | $34.6B | 27.9× | 9.0× | 0.2× | 17.9% | 16.0% | 1.8% | 10.3% | 9.9% | -10.3× | 77 |
| ULTA | $27.9B | 25.3× | 15.0× | 2.3× | 9.7% | 39.1% | 9.3% | 41.1% | 40.3% | -0.2× | 291 |
| CPNG | $26.2B | 132.4× | 21.7× | 0.8× | 14.1% | 29.4% | 0.6% | 4.5% | 3.3% | -4.8× | 108 |
| CDW | $20.7B | 20.4× | 13.2× | 0.9× | 6.8% | 21.7% | 4.8% | 40.9% | 13.0% | 2.6× | 201 |
| W | $16.5B | — | 56.7× | 1.3× | 5.1% | 30.2% | -2.5% | 11.3% | -63.9% | 5.6× | 91 |
| DKS | $14.0B | 14.2× | 8.0× | 0.8× | 28.1% | 32.9% | 4.9% | 15.3% | 15.3% | -0.9× | 199 |
| CHWY | $8.4B | 40.1× | 19.6× | 0.7× | 6.2% | 29.8% | 1.8% | 44.7% | 44.7% | -2.2× | 130 |
| FCFS | $8.1B | 25.3× | — | 2.2× | 8.0% | 50.3% | 9.0% | 14.5% | 7.4% | — | 110 |
| VIPS | $6.1B | 1.3× | 2.6× | 0.4× | 2.0% | 23.1% | 6.8% | 17.7% | 15.5% | -1.8× | 45 |
| NSIT | $5.2B | 36.7× | 11.1× | 0.6× | -5.2% | 21.4% | 1.9% | 9.5% | 9.5% | -0.8× | 66 |
| BBWI | $4.6B | 7.3× | 5.5× | 0.6× | -0.2% | 43.7% | 8.9% | -50.7% | 24.9% | 2.1× | 91 |
| SIG | $4.6B | 16.8× | 6.8× | 0.7× | 1.6% | 39.5% | 4.3% | 15.0% | 15.0% | -1.6× | 65 |
| ASO | $3.7B | 10.9× | 6.1× | 0.6× | 2.0% | 34.8% | 6.2% | 17.4% | 14.2% | 0.2× | 73 |
| PTRN | $3.0B | — | 64.1× | 1.2× | 39.3% | 43.6% | 0.6% | 2.8% | 2.8% | -6.8× | 13 |
| GRDN | $2.6B | — | 26.3× | 1.8× | 17.9% | 20.2% | 3.4% | 22.6% | 22.6% | -0.7× | 19 |
| GCT | $2.2B | 16.9× | 11.6× | 1.7× | 11.1% | 23.3% | 10.6% | 28.3% | 28.3% | -2.5× | 41 |
| EZPW | $1.8B | 20.5× | 10.1× | 1.4× | 9.7% | 58.5% | 8.6% | 10.7% | 7.1% | 0.3× | 63 |
| SBH | $1.7B | 9.7× | 5.7× | 0.5× | -0.4% | 51.6% | 5.3% | 24.7% | 11.7% | 1.7× | 51 |
| RVLV | $1.6B | 26.9× | 17.1× | 1.3× | 8.5% | 53.5% | 5.0% | 12.0% | 12.0% | -3.7× | 31 |
| SVV | $1.4B | 67.6× | 10.2× | 0.9× | 9.2% | — | 1.3% | 5.2% | 2.0% | 3.1× | 24 |
| REAL | $1.4B | — | 135.6× | 2.0× | 15.4% | 74.6% | -6.0% | 10.1% | 10.1% | -16.7× | 31 |
| SPH | $1.2B | 11.0× | 8.6× | 0.8× | 7.9% | 60.6% | 7.4% | — | — | 4.3× | 31 |
| WINA | $1.0B | 25.4× | 18.3× | 11.9× | 5.9% | 96.4% | 48.4% | -77.6% | -77.6% | -0.2× | 37 |
| WOOF | $742M | 86.3× | 6.2× | 0.1× | -2.5% | 38.7% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 3.9× | 29 |
| RMTG | $412169 | — | — | 0.1× | 24.2% | 55.1% | -153% | 21.7% | 21.7% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing RMTG's sector (Retail-Retail Stores, NEC) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2017 | 83.6% | not reported | -1289.3% |
| FY2018 | -36.4% | not reported | -4105.6% |
| FY2019 | -84.4% | not reported | -8335.2% |
| FY2020 | 20.2% | not reported | -10703.5% |
| FY2021 | 34.3% | not reported | -2942.4% |
| FY2022 | 57.3% | not reported | -359.9% |
| FY2023 | 69.5% | -29.7% | -407.2% |
| FY2024 | 68.7% | 2.0% | -135.4% |
| FY2025 | 55.1% | -17.0% | -153.2% |
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Debt is present but there is no positive EBITDA or no reported interest expense, so coverage cannot be measured.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: ebitda.
No growth rate within the range this model can express reaches the current price, so the requirement cannot be stated as a number.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: implied_growth.