Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Kubicek Greg H Director | Grant | 28,952 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-09-30 | Debora Horvath D Director | Grant | 15,059 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-09-21 | Stone Andrew P Chief Legal Officer | Open-market buy | 5,000 | $4.12 | $21k |
| 2026-09-21 | Macomber Sasha G. Chief Human Resource Officer | Open-market buy | 4,895 | $4.08 | $20k |
| 2026-09-16 |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
Robinson Dashiell I President |
| Open-market buy |
| 63,211 |
| $3.98 |
| $252k |
| 2026-09-15 | Abate Christopher J Chief Executive Officer | Open-market buy | 100,000 | $3.84 | $384k |
| 2026-09-15 | Carillo Brooke Chief Financial Officer | Open-market buy | 26,065 | $3.85 | $100k |
| 2026-09-15 | Kubicek Greg H Director | Open-market buyindirect | 50,000 | $3.85 | $193k |
| 2026-06-30 | Kubicek Greg H Director | Grant | 22,072 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-06-30 | Debora Horvath D Director | Grant | 11,739 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-06-30 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 4,975 | $4.87 | $24k |
| 2026-06-30 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 4,975 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-06-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exerciseindirect | 7,259 | $4.73 | $34k |
| 2026-06-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 7,259 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 20,729 | $5.28 | $109k |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exerciseindirect | 20,729 | $5.28 | $109k |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 20,729 | $5.28 | $109k |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exerciseindirect | 20,729 | $5.28 | $109k |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 20,729 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 20,729 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 20,729 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-26 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 20,729 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-19 | Damon Doneene K Director | Grant | 24,809 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-19 | Falcon Armando Director | Grant | 24,809 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-19 | Schwartz Faith A Director | Grant | 24,809 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-19 | Debora Horvath D Director | Grant | 24,809 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-19 | Kubicek Greg H Director | Grant | 24,809 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-19 | Hansen Douglas B Director | Grant | 24,809 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-05-01 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exerciseindirect | 25,065 | $5.56 | $139k |
| 2026-05-01 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Option exercise | 25,065 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Option exercise | 19,274 | $5.97 | $115k |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | Option exerciseindirect | 51,396 | $5.97 | $307k |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Legal Officer | Option exercise | 8,031 | $5.97 | $48k |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Human Resource Officer | Option exercise | 8,031 | $5.97 | $48k |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers President | Option exercise | 20,880 | $5.97 | $125k |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | Tax withholding | 60,212 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Tax withholding | 22,579 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Human Resource Officer | Tax withholding | 9,407 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers President | Tax withholding | 24,461 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-04-14 | 3 co-filers Chief Legal Officer | Tax withholding | 9,407 | $0.00 | — |
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $99.0M dividends + $51.8M buybacks = $150.8M returned on -$10.09B FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · -4%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 14th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -7% against ROIC -7% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RWT: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~19.5% on $3.24B of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selling, General & Admin | $153.9M | $136.4M | $128.3M | $140.9M | $165.2M | $113.5M | $108.7M | $75.3M | $77.2M | $4.5M |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | $166.3M | $176.2M | $203.9M | $235.0M | $131.7M | $83.0M | $77.2M | $88.8M |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $631.5M | $552.4M | $426.7M | $448.0M | $479.8M | $239.0M | $108.8M | $88.5M |
| Interest & Investment Income | $32.1M | $40.0M | $48.0M | $38.2M | $25.4M | $27.1M | $28.1M | $8.2M | $2.9M | $1.2M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | $145K | $1.6M | $2.4M | $1.6M | $1.8M | $0 | $0 | — |
| Pretax Income | -$44.8M | $72.8M | -$639K | -$183.4M | $338.1M | -$586.5M | $176.6M | $130.7M | $152.2M | $135.0M |
| Income Tax Expense | $25.2M | $18.8M | $1.6M | -$19.9M | $18.5M | -$4.6M | $7.4M | $11.1M | $11.8M | $3.7M |
| Net Income | -$70.0M | $54.0M | -$2.3M | -$163.5M | $319.6M | -$581.8M | $169.2M | $119.6M | $140.4M | $131.3M |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$0.63 | $0.32 | -$0.11 | -$1.43 | $2.73 | -$5.12 | $1.63 | $1.47 | $1.78 | $1.66 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$0.63 | $0.32 | -$0.11 | -$1.43 | $2.37 | -$5.12 | $1.46 | $1.34 | $1.60 | $1.54 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 130.3M | 132.1M | 116.3M | 117.2M | 113.2M | 113.9M | 101.1M | 78.7M | 76.8M | 76.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 130.3M | 132.1M | 116.3M | 117.2M | 142.1M | 113.9M | 136.8M | 110.0M | 102.0M | 97.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 32 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAT | $1.3B | 23.8× | 10.7× | 3.1× | -4.7% | 61.1% | 16.4% | 6.2% | 2.5% | 5.8× | 52 |
| UMH | $1.3B | 216.4× | — | 4.9× | 8.8% | — | 10.0% | 2.9% | 2.9% | — | 63 |
| ALX | $1.3B | 45.8× | — | 6.0× | -5.8% | — | 13.2% | 25.9% | 25.9% | — | 24 |
| NHP | $1.1B | — | 12.8× | 3.2× | -3.3% | 36.0% | -16.9% | -9.6% | -9.6% | -0.7× | — |
| DEA | $1.1B | 82.7× | — | 3.1× | 11.3% | 76.9% | 3.9% | 1.0% | 0.4% | — | 54 |
| CMRF | $1.0B | 19.6× | — | 2.5× | -14.0% | — | 12.6% | 8.3% | 2.0% | — | — |
| CSR | $982M | 57.3× | 11.1× | 3.6× | 4.9% | 96.5% | 6.2% | 2.4% | 1.0% | 5.6× | 47 |
| ESRT | $860M | 19.9× | 2.2× | 1.1× | 0.0% | — | 9.5% | 6.9% | 6.9% | -0.4× | 38 |
| SAFE | $800M | 7.1× | — | 2.1× | 5.4% | 98.8% | 29.7% | 4.8% | 1.6% | — | 48 |
| CTO | $764M | 246.4× | 14.6× | 5.1× | 20.1% | 74.6% | 6.7% | 1.8% | 0.9% | 6.5× | 47 |
| BFS | $719M | 26.7× | 4.6× | 2.5× | 7.8% | — | 12.9% | 12.2% | 4.8% | 1.8× | 31 |
| JBGS | $696M | — | 3.3× | 1.4× | -8.9% | — | -27.9% | -12.0% | -12.0% | -0.4× | 39 |
| CLDT | $687M | 105.4× | 9.9× | 2.3× | -7.0% | — | 5.1% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 3.1× | 32 |
| PSTL | $653M | 45.9× | 17.4× | 6.8× | 25.5% | — | 14.8% | 5.0% | 2.2% | 6.2× | 36 |
| UHT | $532M | 30.1× | 14.1× | 5.4× | 0.2% | — | 17.8% | 11.6% | 3.3% | 5.8× | 39 |
| BDN | $513M | — | — | 1.1× | -4.2% | 61.8% | -36.8% | -22.5% | -5.3% | — | 37 |
| NXRT | $461M | — | 16.5× | 1.8× | -3.2% | — | -12.7% | -10.8% | -1.7% | 12.8× | 36 |
| FBRT | $455M | 9.4× | — | 1.7× | 20.9% | — | 30.5% | 5.7% | 5.7% | — | 36 |
| FVR | $453M | — | 27.4× | 6.8× | 39.1% | — | -5.7% | -1.0% | -0.5% | 10.9× | 20 |
| TCI | $438M | 31.2× | 100.9× | 8.9× | 4.2% | — | 28.1% | 1.6% | 1.3% | — | 8 |
| RWT | $393M | — | — | — | — | — | — | -7.1% | -7.1% | — | 32 |
| CHCT | $374M | 163.3× | — | 3.1× | 4.7% | — | 4.2% | 1.2% | 0.5% | — | 26 |
| FPI | $368M | 13.8× | 56.3× | 7.0× | -10.4% | — | 60.5% | 6.7% | 5.0% | 17.2× | 41 |
| LAND | $320M | — | — | 3.6× | 3.7% | 89.1% | 15.3% | 2.0% | 1.2% | — | 41 |
| ARI | $300M | 2.9× | — | 1.1× | -10.6% | — | 46.7% | 6.8% | 6.8% | — | 30 |
Peers = companies sharing RWT's sector (Real Estate Investment Trusts) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
Return on equity (-7%) and return on invested capital (-7%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
Free cash flow has fallen short of reported profit in 3 of the last three years.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | −$70M | −$70M |
| Share-based comp | $20M | −$50M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | −$10.04B | −$10.09B |
| Operating cash flow | −$10.09B | −$10.09B |
| Capex | $0 | −$10.09B |
| Free cash flow | −$10.09B | −$10.09B |
| FCF after SBC | −$10.11B | −$10.11B |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | 7.4 percent |
| FY2020 | -0.7 percent |
| FY2021 | 40.9 percent |
| FY2022 | -0.2 percent |
| FY2023 | 13.9 percent |
| FY2024 | 32.4 percent |
| FY2025 | 42.3 percent |
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.
Reported free cash flow is -$10.09B; after share-based compensation it is -$10.11B. The difference is a real cost that the cash flow statement adds back.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.