Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $18.9M buybacks = $18.9M returned on -$8.2M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -157%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 3 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2011 | FY2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9M 100.0% | $3.3M 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | $3K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $12K 403.7% |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -$9K -303.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | — | — | — | — | — | — | $108K | $130K 4342.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $267.9M 6872.6% | $1.7M 51.7% | $3.7M | $3.4M | $1.4M | $736K | — | — |
| Operating Income | -$264.0M -6772.6% | $1.6M 48.3% | — | — | — | — | -$108K | -$139K -4646.5% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $78K | $196K | $10K | — | $19K | $9K 305.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | $3.3M 100.0% | $3.3M | $4.2M | $2.7M | $1.3M | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$172K -4.4% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — | — | -$19K | -$9K -305.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$264.2M -6777.0% | $1.6M 48.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | $743K 19.1% | $425K 12.9% | -$455K | $10K | $1.1M | $288K | — | — |
| Net Income | -$266.1M -6825.0% | $1.2M 35.4% | -$1.2M | — | — | — | -$127K | -$149K -4951.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$6.59 | $0.18 | -$0.18 | $0.02 | $0.59 | $0.20 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$6.59 | $0.18 | — | — | $0.26 | $0.20 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 40.2M | 6.4M | 6.2M | 5.3M | 4.8M | 10.9M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 40.2M | 6.5M | 6.4M | 5.3M | 4.8M | 4.8M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 33,211 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant9d late | 83,026 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 16,605 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant9d late | 41,513 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 16,605 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant9d late | 41,513 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant9d late | 41,513 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 16,605 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-01-05 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant5d late | 83,026 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-01-05 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant5d late | 41,513 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-01-05 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant5d late | 41,513 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-01-05 | 4 co-filers Group filing | Grant5d late | 41,513 | $0.00 | — |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -157% against ROIC -157% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is -280.8% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2010 | FY2011 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 403.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | -303.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 4342.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | -4646.5 | — | — | — | — | — | 48.3 | -6772.6 |
| Income Tax | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.9 | 19.1 |
| Net Income | -4951.7 | — | — | — | — | — | 35.4 | -6825.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SUIG: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 33 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXP | $214.0B | 20.8× | — | 5.2× | 6.4% | — | 26.2% | 32.4% | 11.9% | — | 1,026 |
| COIN | $37.9B | 32.3× | 20.3× | 5.3× | 9.4% | — | 17.6% | 8.5% | 5.9% | -3.0× | 313 |
| BMNP | $22.5B | 7.2× | 49.5× | — | 84.1% | 5.1% | — | 4.0% | 4.0% | -1.1× | — |
| SOFI | $21.7B | 43.0× | — | 35.1× | 23.1% | 1.7% | 77.7% | 4.6% | 3.9% | — | 266 |
| CHYM | $10.6B | — | — | 4.8× | 30.7% | 88.0% | -46.2% | -72.1% | -72.1% | — | 55 |
| HUT | $7.3B | — | — | 31.1× | 44.8% | 54.2% | -96.2% | -15.9% | -15.9% | — | 69 |
| WULF | $5.9B | — | — | 34.7× | 20.3% | 39.2% | -393% | -471% | -20.4% | — | 82 |
| DAVE | $4.0B | 23.4× | 20.4× | 7.3× | 59.7% | — | 35.3% | 55.5% | 55.5% | -0.4× | 47 |
| GPGI | $3.2B | — | — | 54.2× | -85.8% | 48.1% | -227% | -55.9% | -55.9% | — | 21 |
| CIFR | $3.0B | — | — | 13.5× | 48.0% | 63.7% | -367% | -102% | -23.1% | — | 79 |
| UPST | $2.2B | 51.2× | 50.6× | 2.1× | 64.0% | — | 5.1% | 6.7% | 2.0% | 17.4× | 67 |
| CLSK | $2.0B | — | 3.9× | 2.6× | 102% | 55.2% | 47.6% | 16.8% | 12.9% | 0.9× | 79 |
| PGY | $1.6B | 20.7× | 4.7× | 1.2× | 26.1% | 42.4% | 6.3% | 17.0% | 17.0% | -0.8× | — |
| WLTH | $1.6B | — | — | 4.4× | 18.2% | 89.6% | -11.5% | -6.8% | -6.8% | — | 10 |
| KEEL | $1.3B | — | — | 5.5× | 72.0% | -8.2% | -124% | -50.8% | -23.1% | — | — |
| WD | $1.2B | 21.2× | — | 1.0× | 9.0% | — | 4.6% | 3.2% | 3.2% | — | 38 |
| PWP | $1.1B | 31.3× | 14.4× | 1.5× | -14.5% | — | 4.7% | -27.9% | -27.9% | -4.2× | 19 |
| RHLD | $944M | — | 6.4× | 2.0× | 9.9% | 56.3% | -1.3% | -91.1% | -3.1% | 0.1× | 10 |
| BUR | $747M | 12.1× | — | 1.8× | -24.3% | — | 15.1% | 2.6% | 1.4% | — | 37 |
| QFIN | $629M | 1.6× | — | 0.2× | 16.8% | 84.4% | 31.1% | 24.8% | 24.8% | -0.7× | 25 |
| HKD | $522M | 3.8× | 69.4× | 3.8× | 566% | — | 71.3% | 36.8% | 18.5% | — | 2 |
| FWDI | $484M | — | — | 26.6× | -9.0% | 28.5% | -918% | -11.4% | -11.4% | — | — |
| ABTC | $484M | — | — | 2.6× | 159% | 50.3% | -82.7% | -23.0% | -23.0% | — | — |
| OPRT | $455M | 18.7× | — | 0.5× | -4.5% | — | 2.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | — | 22 |
| WYFI | $402M | — | — | 5.1× | 66.2% | 60.2% | -31.2% | -5.1% | -4.9% | — | 15 |
| SUIG | $79M | — | — | 20.3× | 18.1% | — | — | -157% | -157% | — | 2 |
Peers = companies sharing SUIG's sector (Finance Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2010 | -303.7% | -4646.5% | -4951.7% |
| FY2024 | not reported | 48.3% | 35.4% |
| FY2025 | not reported | -6772.6% | -6825.0% |
Return on equity (-157%) and return on invested capital (-157%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: wacc.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a bank.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
At $1.03, free cash flow must compound 2.83%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record after stock compensation to compare against.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM.
The cost of capital could not be computed for this company, so the requirement is solved at the published 10% default — a different rate would move it materially.