Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $7.53B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 3 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 22%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 3 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.89B 100.0% | $1.55B 100.0% | $1.32B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $381.9M 20.2% | $273.4M 17.7% | $194.7M 14.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.91B 101.0% | $1.37B 88.6% | $1.13B 85.1% |
| Operating Income | $590.7M 31.2% | $728.2M 47.1% | $650.1M 49.1% |
| Interest Expense | $19.5M 1.0% | $15.0M 1.0% | $24.1M 1.8% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $69.7M 3.7% | -$10.7M -0.7% | $6.6M 0.5% |
| Pretax Income | $660.4M 34.9% | $717.5M 46.4% | $656.7M 49.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $161.7M 8.5% | $167.2M 10.8% | $155.2M 11.7% |
| Net Income | $498.7M 26.3% | $550.3M 35.6% | $501.5M 37.9% |
| Per Share | |||
| EPS (Basic) | $48.92 | $53.31 | $48.57 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $48.43 | $52.63 | $47.81 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.02B | 1.03B | 1.03B |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.03B | 1.05B | 1.05B |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 26% against ROIC 22% — 4% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is 27.2% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 14.7 | 17.7 | 20.2 |
| Operating Income | 49.1 | 47.1 | 31.2 |
| Income Tax | 11.7 | 10.8 | 8.5 |
| Net Income | 37.9 | 35.6 | 26.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on WSE: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
The same 3 years as the 3-yr average, with the stock compensation of those years charged as a cost. Shares issued to employees are real dilution, so this asks what the business generates for existing holders.
A reverse DCF cannot be solved for WSE: its net cash ($27.47B) exceeds its market value, so enterprise value is negative. Discounting a positive cash-flow stream always gives a positive number, so no growth rate reaches that target. This is common for banks, brokers and payment companies, where customer balances sit in the cash line and are not the company's to spend.
On the basis ($5.76B) the requirement is off the scale. The difference is what charging stock compensation costs.
Default is the published 10.0% — this company's own cost of capital could not be computed.
2-stage DCF · 0.97B shares (market data) · net debt -$27.47B
Today's price is outside this grid at every discount rate shown — the assumptions it requires lie beyond the plotted range, which is itself the finding.
mean 36.9% · volatility σ 6% · implied rate exceeded in 2/2 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (6%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~5.8% on $334.7M of debt.
Cash of $27.80B fully covers short-term debt of $6.0M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Cash conversion and accruals. The full answer — share-based compensation, the cash conversion waterfall, working-capital trend — is still being built, so this block states what it measures rather than issuing a verdict.
One year is not a trend. The spec asks for a 3- and 5-year average of FCF/net income precisely because a single year turns on working-capital timing, and that arrives with the full Q2 block.