Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 11% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $22.1M dividends + $105.0M buybacks = $127.1M returned on $206.7M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 18%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.09B 100.0% | $5.87B 100.0% | $4.81B 100.0% | $3.56B 100.0% | $3.63B 100.0% | $2.19B 100.0% | $3.09B 100.0% | $3.54B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $288.9M 26.4% | $1.74B 29.6% | $1.54B 32.1% | $1.34B 37.5% | $1.96B 54.1% | $2.07B 94.5% | $1.63B 52.9% | $1.19B 33.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $28.5M 2.6% | $175.9M 3.0% | $153.9M 3.2% | $143.2M 4.0% | $187.9M 5.2% | $179.2M 8.2% | $227.5M 7.4% | $220.0M 6.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $859.3M 78.7% | $4.00B 68.1% | $3.35B 69.6% | $2.35B 65.9% | $2.32B 63.8% | $3.62B 165.2% | $2.28B 73.7% | $2.27B 64.0% |
| Operating Income | $233.1M 21.3% | $1.87B 31.9% | $1.46B 30.4% | $1.21B 34.1% | $1.31B 36.2% | -$1.43B -65.2% | $812.6M 26.3% | $1.28B 36.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $9K 0.0% | $10K 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $18.9M 1.7% | $13.5M 0.2% | $24.4M 0.5% | $40.7M 1.1% | $32.5M 0.9% | $12.7M 0.6% | $26.1M 0.8% | -$5.9M -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $250.2M 22.9% | $1.89B 32.3% | $1.47B 30.5% | $1.22B 34.2% | $1.19B 32.8% | -$1.60B -73.0% | $663.9M 21.5% | $1.08B 30.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $41.7M 3.8% | $405.7M 6.9% | $261.1M 5.4% | $396.1M 11.1% | $368.7M 10.2% | -$299.9M -13.7% | -$93.1M -3.0% | -$209.9M -5.9% |
| Net Income | $209.4M 19.2% | $1.54B 26.2% | $1.19B 24.6% | $812.0M 22.8% | $825.4M 22.8% | -$1.31B -59.7% | $774.3M 25.1% | $883.1M 24.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.86 | $5.33 | $4.12 | $2.57 | $2.51 | -$4.07 | $2.47 | $3.08 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.84 | $5.25 | $4.08 | $2.52 | $2.45 | -$4.07 | $2.42 | $2.91 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 244.0M | 288.8M | 288.1M | 316.4M | 329.2M | 321.2M | 313.8M | 286.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 249.5M | 293.4M | 290.8M | 322.4M | 336.9M | 321.2M | 319.7M | 304.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $141.2M fully covers short-term debt of $58.6M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Ranked against 32 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXP | $214.0B | 20.8× | — | 5.2× | 6.4% | — | 26.2% | 32.4% | 11.9% | — | 1,026 |
| COIN | $37.9B | 32.3× | 20.3× | 5.3× | 9.4% | — | 17.6% | 8.5% | 5.9% | -3.0× | 313 |
| BMNP | $22.5B | 7.2× | 49.5× | — | 84.1% | 5.1% | — | 4.0% | 4.0% | -1.1× | — |
| SOFI | $21.7B | 43.0× | — | 35.1× | 23.1% | 1.7% | 77.7% | 4.6% | 3.9% | — | 266 |
| CHYM | $10.6B | — | — | 4.8× | 30.7% | 88.0% | -46.2% | -72.1% | -72.1% | — | 55 |
| HUT | $7.3B | — | — | 31.1× | 44.8% | 54.2% | -96.2% | -15.9% | -15.9% | — | 69 |
| WULF | $5.9B | — | — | 34.7× | 20.3% | 39.2% | -393% | -471% | -20.4% | — | 82 |
| DAVE | $4.0B | 23.4× | 20.4× | 7.3× | 59.7% | — | 35.3% | 55.5% | 55.5% | -0.4× | 47 |
| GPGI | $3.2B | — | — | 54.2× | -85.8% | 48.1% | -227% | -55.9% | -55.9% | — | 21 |
| CIFR | $3.0B | — | — | 13.5× | 48.0% | 63.7% | -367% | -102% | -23.1% | — | 79 |
| UPST | $2.2B | 51.2× | 50.6× | 2.1× | 64.0% | — | 5.1% | 6.7% | 2.0% | 17.4× | 67 |
| CLSK | $2.0B | — | 3.9× | 2.6× | 102% | 55.2% | 47.6% | 16.8% | 12.9% | 0.9× | 79 |
| PGY | $1.6B | 20.7× | 4.7× | 1.2× | 26.1% | 42.4% | 6.3% | 17.0% | 17.0% | -0.8× | — |
| WLTH | $1.6B | — | — | 4.4× | 18.2% | 89.6% | -11.5% | -6.8% | -6.8% | — | 10 |
| KEEL | $1.3B | — | — | 5.5× | 72.0% | -8.2% | -124% | -50.8% | -23.1% | — | — |
| WD | $1.2B | 21.2× | — | 1.0× | 9.0% | — | 4.6% | 3.2% | 3.2% | — | 38 |
| PWP | $1.1B | 31.3× | 14.4× | 1.5× | -14.5% | — | 4.7% | -27.9% | -27.9% | -4.2× | 19 |
| RHLD | $944M | — | 6.4× | 2.0× | 9.9% | 56.3% | -1.3% | -91.1% | -3.1% | 0.1× | 10 |
| BUR | $747M | 12.1× | — | 1.8× | -24.3% | — | 15.1% | 2.6% | 1.4% | — | 37 |
| QFIN | $629M | 1.6× | — | 0.2× | 16.8% | 84.4% | 31.1% | 24.8% | 24.8% | -0.7× | 25 |
| HKD | $522M | 3.8× | 69.4× | 3.8× | 566% | — | 71.3% | 36.8% | 18.5% | — | 2 |
| FWDI | $484M | — | — | 26.6× | -9.0% | 28.5% | -918% | -11.4% | -11.4% | — | — |
| ABTC | $484M | — | — | 2.6× | 159% | 50.3% | -82.7% | -23.0% | -23.0% | — | — |
| OPRT | $455M | 18.7× | — | 0.5× | -4.5% | — | 2.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | — | 22 |
| WYFI | $402M | — | — | 5.1× | 66.2% | 60.2% | -31.2% | -5.1% | -4.9% | — | 15 |
| XYF | $176M | 5.7× | 0.4× | 0.2× | 35.8% | 73.6% | 19.2% | 18.7% | 17.8% | -0.3× | 4 |
Peers = companies sharing XYF's sector (Finance Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 4 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-01 | Zhang Longgen Director | Other | 90,000 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-01 | Xue Zheng Director | Other | 90,000 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Open-market sale4d late | 90,000 | $5.29 | $476k |
| 2026-06-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Open-market sale4d late | 90,000 | $5.18 | $466k |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range · 31th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 19% against ROIC 18% — 1% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is 20.2% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 33.5 | 52.9 | 94.5 | 54.1 | 37.5 | 32.1 | 29.6 | 26.4 |
| SG&A | 6.2 | 7.4 | 8.2 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.6 |
| Operating Income | 36.0 | 26.3 | -65.2 | 36.2 | 34.1 | 30.4 | 31.9 | 21.3 |
| Income Tax | -5.9 | -3.0 | -13.7 | 10.2 | 11.1 | 5.4 | 6.9 | 3.8 |
| Net Income | 24.9 | 25.1 | -59.7 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 24.6 | 26.2 | 19.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on XYF: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2018 | 66.5% | 36.0% | 24.9% |
| FY2019 | 47.1% | 26.3% | 25.1% |
| FY2020 | 5.5% | -65.2% | -59.7% |
| FY2021 | 45.9% | 36.2% | 22.8% |
| FY2022 | 40.3% | 30.4% | 22.8% |
| FY2023 | 40.4% | 29.9% | 24.6% |
| FY2024 | 70.4% | 31.9% | 26.2% |
| FY2025 | 73.6% | 21.3% | 19.2% |
Return on equity (19%) and return on invested capital (18%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: wacc.
Converts 0.72x of reported profit into cash — adequate, without much margin.
The cash conversion cycle could not be computed — receivables, inventory or cost of revenue is not reported — so the earliest accrual warning is not part of this verdict.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a bank.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
No growth rate within the range this model can express reaches the current price, so the requirement cannot be stated as a number.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. No TTM point: the four most recent quarters do not form a usable window.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: implied_growth.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $209M | $209M |
| Share-based comp | $9M | $218M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | −$8M | $210M |
| Operating cash flow | $210M | $210M |
| Capex | −$3M | $207M |
| Free cash flow | $207M | $207M |
| FCF after SBC | $198M | $198M |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | -24.2% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2021 | 69.3% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2022 | -9.2% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2023 | 31.3% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2024 | 18.6% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2025 | 35.8% | not reported | not reported |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | 2.1 percent |
| FY2020 | -8.4 percent |
| FY2021 | 5.1 percent |
| FY2022 | 5.5 percent |
| FY2023 | 3.2 percent |
| FY2024 | 0.1 percent |
| FY2025 | -0.0 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.